How to Patent and Idea
Learning how to patent an idea is often the first step in the invention and patent process for new inventors. When inventors contact my company, InventionHome.com about the patent process and learning how to patent an idea, we believe they should start by learning about provisional patent applications vs. utility (non-provisional) patent applications. To understand the provisional patent, you must first understand the difference between provisional and non-provisional patents. The non-provisional patent is what is traditionally thought of as the "full" patent. It can be of either a "utility" or a "design" variety, and it establishes the filing date and begins the USPTO’s patent review process. On the other hand, the provisional patent provides temporary protection in that it establishes the filing date but does not start the USPTO review. The provisional patent is good for one year from the filing date. It is significantly cheaper than a non-provisional patent and provides the inventor with a 12–month period in which to market and/or develop their invention (while using the term "patent pending") before they need to invest in a "full" non-provisional patent. The provisional patent does not require the patent claims, which are a key element of the non-provisional application. Additionally, a provisional application is not examined by the USPTO and does not convert to a regular patent. The inventor must submit the non-provisional application within one year of the provisional filing date; otherwise, they would not be able to use the original filing date of the provisional application.
A provisional patent application should include the following elements, which are significantly scaled back from the non-provisional application:
- Cover sheet – identifying the provisional application, the name of the inventor, and other bibliographic data
- Description of invention – invention claims are not required, just an adequate description of the invention
- Drawing – if necessary to understand the invention
- Filing Fee – at the time that I’m writing this guide, the fee is $110.
- More information about "Design" versus "Utility" patents can be obtained at www.uspto.gov.
Inventors often ask if it makes sense to file their own patent application as opposed to hiring a patent attorney. This question is a matter of opinion, but I believe it depends on the type of application you are filing.
Provisional Application – Absolutely! The provisional application process is not overly complicated; therefore, I believe that many inventors can file a reasonably good application if they spend the time researching and understanding the application process and writing the application. Although, if you do not have the time, the cost to have someone else prepare it is usually under a thousand dollars. In this case, it may be worth your time to hire a third party.
Non-provisional Application – Absolutely NOT! Although there are many good books on the topic of filing your own patent application, the process is not easy. In my opinion, even with patent filing books as your guide, the process is difficult and requires a level of expertise that only comes with practice. Although you may be able to work through the components of the application, capturing the optimal language in the claims section is not trivial. This is one time that you should rely on the expertise of a registered patent attorney. If you do not have one, I would be happy to refer you to several.
Provisional Application – Absolutely! The provisional application process is not overly complicated; therefore, I believe that many inventors can file a reasonably good application if they spend the time researching and understanding the application process and writing the application. Although, if you do not have the time, the cost to have someone else prepare it is usually under a thousand dollars. In this case, it may be worth your time to hire a third party.
Non-provisional Application – Absolutely NOT! Although there are many good books on the topic of filing your own patent application, the process is not easy. In my opinion, even with patent filing books as your guide, the process is difficult and requires a level of expertise that only comes with practice. Although you may be able to work through the components of the application, capturing the optimal language in the claims section is not trivial. This is one time that you should rely on the expertise of a registered patent attorney. If you do not have one, I would be happy to refer you to several.
About the Author:Russell Williams cofounded InventionHome.com and MatchProduct.com to assist inventors and entrepreneurs through the patent and invention development and marketing process. He's been asked nearly every invention-related question in the book, and shares his wisdom in an article series, "Inventor Q&A".
Chocolate Coffee eLiquid
Ante Merideim™ Chocolate Coffee E-Liquid is a rich blend of Chocolate and Mint flavors. Each puff envelopes the user in rich layers of robust coffee and savory chocolate. If you like your coffee mixed with wonderfully sweet chocolate, you will to enjoy the unique flavor of Ante Merideim™ eLiquid. Ante Merideim™ eLiquid is made in the USA.
Ante Merideim™ eLiquid works in all models of electronic cigarettes. As with all VapeSafe® eLiquids, Ante Merideim™ eLiquid is made in the USA using organic, hypoallergenic, USP and food grade vegetable glycerin.
E-Liquid Legal Disclaimers:
Always keep VapeSafe® eLiquids away from children!
VapeSafe Ante Merideim™ eLiquid is for Adults Only! You must be of legal age in your state to use our products! Absolutely no sales to minors!
Always be sure to allow the Ante Merideim™ eLiquid time to fully soak into the cartridge or cartomizer (cartridge with built in atomizer) before use. To stretch your dollar further, please note that these flavors are more concentrated than normal and can be diluted with small amounts of distilled water without compromising the flavor.
Mouthwatering Chocolate Recipes:
Enticing Chocolate Muffins, Icings, and more:
The simplest icing is a glacé icing, containing icing sugar and water. This can be flavored and colored as desired, for example by using lemon juice in place of the water. More complicated icings can be made by beating fat into icing sugar (as in butter cream), by melting fat and sugar together, by using egg whites (as in royal icing), and by adding other ingredients such as glycerin (as in fondant). Some icings can be made from combinations of sugar and cream cheeses, or by using ground almonds (as in marzipan).
Plain Chocolate Caramels
2-1/2 cups of sugar, 3/4 cup of glucose, (pure corn syrup), 1/2 a cup of butter, 1/8 a teaspoonful of cream of tartar, 2-1/2 cups of whole milk, (not skimmed), 2-1/2 squares of Baker's Chocolate, 1 teaspoonful of vanilla extract.
Put the sugar, glucose, butter, cream of tartar and one cup of the milk over the fire, stir constantly, and when the mass has boiled a few moments, gradually stir in the rest of the milk. Do not let the mixture stop boiling while the milk is being added. Stir every few moments and cook to 248° F., or, until when tested in cold water, a hard ball may be formed; add the chocolate and vanilla and beat them thoroughly through the candy, then turn it into two bread pans. When nearly cold cut into squares.
Tags: Divorce Attorney, Law Office, Trial Attorney, Copyright Law, Lawyers and Attorneys
